The Forbidden Queen by Anne O’Brien

A tale of Katherine’s heart, and her woes.

The Forbidden Queen by Anne O’Brien
Mira Publications, March 1, 2013
Advance Review copy eBook from NetGalley
Burton Book Review Rating:3 stars

1415. The Battle of Agincourt is over, and the young French princess Katherine de Valois is the prize to be offered to Henry V of England. The innocent Katherine is smitten with Henry, but soon understands that her sole purpose is to produce an heir to unite England and France. Henry will take Katherine, not for her beauty, not for a treaty of peace – but for nothing less than the glittering French crown itself. For Katherine, a pawn in a ruthless political game, England is a lion’s den of greed, avarice and mistrust. And when the magnificent King leaves her widowed at twenty-one she is a prize ripe for the taking. Her enemies are circling, her heart is on her sleeve, her hand in marriage is worth a kingdom. 

But Katherine is still young and passionate. Many desire her, and her hand in marriage is worth a kingdom. Setting aside those driven by ambition, Katherine falls in love with her servant Owen Tudor, and glimpses the happiness that love can bring. But their enemies are circling, all battling for power and determined to prevent their marriage. Katherine will have to fight to control her own destiny…

In this compelling and beautifully written book, Anne O’Brien tells the story of the innocent young princess, Katherine de Valois, a pawn in a ruthless political game between England and France, and the woman who founded the most famous royal dynasty of all – the Tudors.

This is the story of Katherine of Valois, and as the cover suggests, she played an important role in the founding of England’s Tudor dynasty. Before she got to that point in her life, the story puts her in a nunnery and then married to the King of England as a young woman. Being married to Henry V, I was expecting a bit more pluck or spunk from Katherine, but we didn’t get that. Her new ladies in waiting ridiculed her for being a timid mouse. We read of her daily wishes to be closer to Henry, as she was merely an object of his ambition towards the French crown. Henry V was business like, and only available to beget heirs, and so we were subjected to Katherine’s woeful reflections of Henry. Katherine’s character became quite boring as she pined for Henry, while he was near and then when he was dead.

Without  Henry and his guidance, Katherine becomes depressed and despondent and feeling quite useless in her role to look pretty and dignified until Edmund Beaufort comes along and entertains and woos her. Her world then revolves around Edmund. (And when that fell through, oh horrors.. couldn’t see that coming…) She falls for a servant, a major no-no for a Queen. Amidst the love affairs, she has meetings with the council members regarding her status; she must be respectful as a Queen Dowager and think of her son’s future as the King of England at all times. Once the council realizes that Katherine is indeed her lustful mother’s daughter they even go so far as to rule that the Queen may not wed unless the King and his council agree to it (Henry VI the King was still quite young and wouldn’t reach his majority for many years).

Anne O’Brien takes on this character of Katherine as a complete focus on her and her life. She leaves out historical nuances and details except for the times that Katherine had to face the irate council members who wanted Katherine to live out a chaste life. I was getting quite bored with Katherine’s need for romance until the last ten percent of the book, where Master Owen steps up to the plate and offers some well needed drama. Even though the synopsis introduces Owen Tudor in the second paragraph, it wasn’t until at least halfway through that Owen starts to become a major figure.

I would have loved to see more of the children, more name dropping of the important figures of the time, or even an idea of what year we were in. I was reading from an eBook, so perhaps chapter headings with dates/places/settings would be added later. The cover features the red blob that touts “Better than Philippa Gregory” which I found untrue. If O’Brien placed a bit more emphasis on the events of the era and other political figures, or added more historical details perhaps I could have entertained that notion of being in the same league of Gregory. (The dispute of whether Gregory is a historically accurate author left aside, at least Gregory offers us a meaty take on the era she writes).

This story was 98% romance in my opinion, and the constant need Katherine had for any significant other was grating. “The fundamental aching need that had touched me when I had seen him stride from the river had not lessened with the passage of time. It had grown until I had no peace.” A Mr Darcy moment, perhaps?

This was my first read on Katherine, and I am not sure I need to read anything else on her. This characterization of Katherine did little to win me over. To stoop so low as to wed a servant? A Welshman at that, who was forbidden to even wear a sword? A Queen Dowager? If only the writing was focused less on the romance angle and a bit more of a sweeping tale from a few angles, even more political ones, I could have appreciated it more. There was no interaction with her family from France, just the stigmas of her eccentric parents that followed Katherine. And no mention of her elder sister Isabella who was also a Queen of England before her. The purpose of Katherine’s marriage to Henry V was to offer the French crown to Henry as opposed to her brother Charles. And the famous Joan of Arc was a proud supporter of Charles, and she was not a single blip on Katherine’s radar according to this telling.

I felt the first person narration of Katherine limited the scope and since the author also chose to limit the scope to the romance, there was very little complexity in it. Most history lovers of the era already know the marriage partners of Katherine of Valois, and the author simply filled in the blanks for how Katherine related to those men, and I was hoping for more. But I am in the minority here, so perhaps it was just bad timing on my part, as there are quite a few glowing stars in favor of the book on Goodreads.  Recommended for those readers eager for the story of Katherine and her heart’s content, and her woes. Based on that, if you like romance stories, and its plights to a queen, you should enjoy this quick reading romance based on a lesser-known historical figure.



Filed under 2013 Releases, 2013 Review, Henry VI, Katherine of Valois

10 responses to “The Forbidden Queen by Anne O’Brien

  1. You were more generous than I would have been given what you've said about the focus of the story and characterizations. I think you would probably like the Hickson one better although it does get a little slow in parts.

  2. Thanks Daphne! Definitely would probably like the Hickson one better!

  3. I'm thinking no on this one. Haven't read much about this Katherine, but I imagine her more stronger than this. Fair and balanced review Marie!

  4. Having really enjoyed O'Brien's take on Alice Perrars in The King's Concubine I was really looking forward to this one. I've also read The Virgin Widow, about Anne Neville, but while I liked it overall I do think it was missing the historical nuances you cite as missing from this one. I'm glad to know going into reading the book that I should expect romance rather than politics. Thanks for the great review.

  5. I rather enjoyed O'Brien's Queen Defiant, as well.

  6. This cover is beautiful! I usually don't judge a book based on a review but her character sounds a bit annoying though so I think this is one I will skip!

  7. I'm so glad that I wasn't the only one a tad disappointed with this book. I have really enjoyed reading some of her other works but this one left me feeling….Eh….When I wrote my review I noticed so many people giving it 5 stars and I had to go see if anyone else felt the way I did. Thank you for your honesty in your review and for helping me realize that I'm not alone after all. 🙂

  8. I read 'The Queen's Secret' by Jean Plaidy which was also about Catherine, and I think that might have incorporated more of the historical events into the story, as well as giving Katherine a more colorful childhood. Personally, the Synopsis of this book rather put me off. As if there wasn't any greed, avarice and corruption in the French court, indeed there was a virtual civil war in France before Henry came along. One historical inaccuracy I noticed that seems to be highlighted in your review is that Owen Tudor is described as a 'servant'. I think he was actually a knight or squire, and of fairly distinguished ancestry (Welsh royal I believe).

  9. Thanks for your comments today- it seems we may have similar tastes with both Christian reads mixed in with historicals. I look forward to exploring your blog!

  10. Yes thanks indeed for following me, and I hope my pedantic tendency to want to point out what's incorrect doesn't prove too irksome. (If needs be just tell this wench to cease her prattling!). I was rather pleased and exited to come across your blog. Historical. Christian, and a smattering of Medieval. I saw a passing mention of 'long winded reviews' in one of your posts as I was scrolling along. I'm not the only long winded one then (grins).

Comment here (remember, this is a backup site only)

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s